"Objective" was the best word I could come up with at the time. I knew it wasn't quite right, but it was all I had. "Clinical" is better.myst a écrit :@selderane: What do you mean with "being too objective"? I'm not trying to be snarky here, just curious about your understanding of objectivity.
Maybe you're right, but the point that I was trying to make is that being a tough guy living in a small town with the imposing landscapes that populate the peninsula, where you know that there are a group of wise men of the forest that do funky rituals for the spirits of the wind and even they are kind of nervous about certain stuff going on in the creepy place where a friend of yours dissapeared when you were a kid kind of makes you humbler than being an academic in the early 20th century New England. And that arrogance of the learned man against the absolute futility and lack of meaning of the human world in the face of a truth that doesn't care about you seems to be the point of Lovecraft's work.
While I agree that the aspects you used to describe lovecraftian horror are completely adequate to SoE, describing Lovecraft's work as fear of the unknown and the potential harm to everything you care is describing it with way too broad strokes. That's about half of what the horror genre does before and after Howie.
And you omitted "indifference" when you summarized what I said about Lovecraftian horror. Sans that, I would agree with everything you said about horror in general. I think Lovecraftian horror is what it is because the source of horror is indifferent to you and everything you care about.